South Carolina — S.C. Code §59-1-490 (data use and governance)
The Department of Education Data Use and Governance Policy: privacy protections for student data the department holds, restrictions on out-of-state transfers, and prohibitions on collecting listed categories — biometric records included.
Contents
| Document | Covers |
|---|---|
| DATA-GOVERNANCE.md | §59-1-490 in full |
Licence
The reproduced text is S.C. Code §59-1-490, enacted by the South Carolina General Assembly and served by the Legislative Services Agency on scstatehouse.gov. No copyright subsists in this text. In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., 590 U.S. 255 (2020), the Supreme Court held: "Under what has been dubbed the government edicts doctrine, officials empowered to speak with the force of law cannot be the authors of—and therefore cannot copyright—the works they create in the course of their official duties." It went on: "judges—and, we now confirm, legislators—may not be considered the 'authors' of the works they produce in the course of their official duties as judges and legislators. That rule applies regardless of whether a given material carries the force of law." (slip opinion, pp. 1 and 5–6, read 2026-10-01.)
The code page links Disclaimer and Policies pages this audit did not read; nothing on the code page itself asserts copyright (read 2026-10-01).
Public-domain text carries no conditions. The corpus attributes it all the same: the {.meta} provenance line on each section names the publisher, the Sources section links the official text, and the Meta section describes what the builder changed (markup and anchors only). Nothing here suggests that the South Carolina General Assembly endorses the corpus.
Related
- WV §18-2-5h — sibling governance statute
- FL §1002.222 — sibling biometric ban