EdLaw nat/us/state/ak/personal-information-protection-act/README.md

language: en · status: in-force · last checked: 2026-10-08

Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AS 45.48)

AS 45.48 "may be cited as the Alaska Personal Information Protection Act" (AS 45.48.995). It was enacted by SCS CSHB 65(FIN) am S (Laws of Alaska 2008), which "takes effect July 1, 2009" apart from two provisions that took effect immediately (enrolled bill, sec. 10, read 2026-10-08). The corpus reproduces two of the chapter's articles plus its general provisions:

Alaska has no student-data-privacy statute (see the research note), so for a vendor handling an Alaska district's data these articles are the state-law breach and security layer.

Applicability to EdTech

Contents

Document Covers
PERSONAL-INFORMATION-PROTECTION.md AS 45.48.010–45.48.090 (Article 1, breach of security), AS 45.48.500–45.48.590 (Article 4, disposal of records), AS 45.48.990–45.48.995 (general provisions)

Not reproduced: Article 2 (credit report and credit score security freeze, AS 45.48.100–45.48.290), Article 3 (protection of social security numbers, AS 45.48.400–45.48.480), Article 5 (factual declaration of innocence after identity theft, AS 45.48.600–45.48.690) and Article 6 (truncation of card information, AS 45.48.750).

Key obligations at a glance

Enforcement

A governmental agency that violates Article 1 is liable for a civil penalty of up to $500 for each resident not notified, capped at $50,000, and the Department of Administration enforces against it (AS 45.48.080(a), (c)). For anyone else, a violation is an unfair or deceptive act or practice under AS 45.50.471–45.50.561, with the same penalty cap and limited damages (AS 45.48.080(b)). A knowing violation of Article 4 carries a civil penalty of up to $3,000 (AS 45.48.550(a)). An individual damaged by an Article 4 violation may sue (AS 45.48.560). A waiver of Article 1 is void (AS 45.48.060).

Licence

The reproduced text is AS 45.48 as enacted by the Alaska Legislature, served on the Legislature's statutes site, whose pages carry no copyright notice or reproduction terms (read 2026-10-08). No copyright subsists in statute text. In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., 590 U.S. 255 (2020) (slip opinion), the Supreme Court held that "officials empowered to speak with the force of law cannot be the authors of—and therefore cannot copyright—the works they create in the course of their official duties". The corpus reproduces section numbers, catchlines and text, and nothing else from the site.

Conditions: none. The corpus names the source in Sources and in each section's {.meta} provenance line.

Sources