EdLaw nat/gb/gdpr/ENFORCEMENT.md

language: en · last checked: 2026-09-06

Enforcement, remedies and penalties

The Commissioner's powers, data subjects' remedies (complaints, judicial remedies, representation, compensation and liability), and the administrative fines regime.

Article 58 — Powers

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. The Commissioner has all of the following investigative powers:

2. The Commissioner has all of the following corrective powers:

3. The Commissioner has all of the following authorisation and advisory powers:

3A. In the 2018 Act, section 115(4) to (9) provide that the Commissioner's functions under this Article are subject to certain safeguards.

4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 77 — Right to lodge a complaint with the Commissioner

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 78 — Right to an effective judicial remedy against the Commissioner

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of the Commissioner concerning them.

2. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the Commissioner does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged pursuant to Article 77.

3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 79 — Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. Without prejudice to any available administrative or non-judicial remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with the Commissioner pursuant to Article 77, each data subject shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy where he or she considers that his or her rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of his or her personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.

2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 80 — Representation of data subjects

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. The data subject shall have the right to mandate a body or other organisation which meets the conditions in section 187(3) and (4) of the 2018 Act to make a complaint under section 164A or 165 of the 2018 Act on his or her behalf, to exercise the rights referred to in Articles ... 78 and 79 on his or her behalf, and to exercise the right to receive compensation referred to in Article 82 on his or her behalf ... .

2. The Secretary of State may provide that any body, organisation or association referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, independently of a data subject's mandate, has the right to make a complaint under section 164A or 165 of the 2018 Act and to exercise the rights referred to in Articles 78 and 79 if it considers that the rights of a data subject under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing.

3. The Secretary of State may exercise the power under paragraph 2 of this Article only by making regulations under section 190 of the 2018 Act.

Article 81 — Suspension of proceedings

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 82 — Right to compensation and liability

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. Any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of this Regulation shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or processor for the damage suffered.

2. Any controller involved in processing shall be liable for the damage caused by processing which infringes this Regulation. A processor shall be liable for the damage caused by processing only where it has not complied with obligations of this Regulation specifically directed to processors or where it has acted outside or contrary to lawful instructions of the controller.

3. A controller or processor shall be exempt from liability under paragraph 2 if it proves that it is not in any way responsible for the event giving rise to the damage.

4. Where more than one controller or processor, or both a controller and a processor, are involved in the same processing and where they are, under paragraphs 2 and 3, responsible for any damage caused by processing, each controller or processor shall be held liable for the entire damage in order to ensure effective compensation of the data subject.

5. Where a controller or processor has, in accordance with paragraph 4, paid full compensation for the damage suffered, that controller or processor shall be entitled to claim back from the other controllers or processors involved in the same processing that part of the compensation corresponding to their part of responsibility for the damage, in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraph 2.

6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Article 83 — General conditions for imposing administrative fines

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

1. The Commissioner shall ensure that the imposition of administrative fines pursuant to this Article in respect of infringements of this Regulation referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 shall in each individual case be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

2. Administrative fines shall, depending on the circumstances of each individual case, be imposed in addition to, or instead of, measures referred to in points (a) to (h) and (j) of Article 58(2). When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case due regard shall be given to the following:

3. If a controller or processor intentionally or negligently, for the same or linked processing operations, infringes several provisions of this Regulation, the total amount of the administrative fine shall not exceed the amount specified for the gravest infringement.

4. Infringements of the following provisions shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, be subject to administrative fines up to £8,700,000, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 2 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:

5. Infringements of the following provisions shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, be subject to administrative fines up to £17,500,000, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:

6. Non-compliance with an order by the Commissioner as referred to in Article 58(2) shall, in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, be subject to administrative fines up to £17,500,000, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.

7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10. In the 2018 Act, section 115(9) makes provision about the exercise of the Commissioner's functions under this Article.

Article 84 — Penalties

Verbatim from legislation.gov.uk (consolidated text, valid as at 2026-06-19).

Part 6 of the 2018 Act makes further provision about penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation.

Sources

Meta

All article text above is reproduced verbatim from the consolidated UK GDPR on legislation.gov.uk, extracted mechanically from the official XML. Repealed or omitted text appears as "..." exactly as published. Amendment history is available via each article link. Each provision carries its official identifier as a trailing attribute anchor (e.g. {#article-35-2}, attributes syntax) — the same id legislation.gov.uk uses, so .../eur/2016/679/article/35/2 at the source corresponds to #article-35-2 here.