EdLaw nat/us/state/md/online-data-privacy/README.md

language: en · status: in-force · last checked: 2026-10-08

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (MODPA)

Maryland's comprehensive consumer privacy statute, Commercial Law Title 14, Subtitle 47. It was enacted as the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 (Chapters 454 and 455 of 2024, HB 567 and SB 541), which took effect October 1, 2025. The chapter law numbered the subtitle 14-4601 et seq.; it is codified as §§14-4701 to 14-4714. The act applies to a person that conducts business in Maryland or targets its residents and, in the preceding calendar year, controlled or processed the personal data of at least 35,000 consumers, or of 10,000 consumers while deriving more than 20% of its gross revenue from selling personal data (§14-4702). It sets consumer rights, controller duties, processor contract terms and data protection assessments. It is stricter than most state privacy laws on minors and sensitive data. The text here is the one in effect on 1 October 2026, which includes the 2026 amendments (Chapter 874, HB 711, effective July 1, 2026; Chapter 435, HB 264, effective October 1, 2026).

Applicability to EdTech

Contents

Document Covers
MODPA.md Commercial Law §§14-4701 to 14-4714 in full, as in effect on 1 October 2026

Key obligations at a glance

Enforcement

A violation is an unfair, abusive or deceptive trade practice under Title 13 of the Commercial Law Article and subject to its enforcement and penalty provisions, except §13-408 (§14-4713(a)). For alleged violations on or before April 1, 2027, the Consumer Protection Division may first issue a notice of violation with at least 60 days to cure (§14-4714). Under Section 2 of Chapter 454 of 2024, the act does not apply to processing activities before April 1, 2026 (Chapter 454 of 2024, uncodified).

Licence

The corpus reproduces Commercial Law §§14-4701 to 14-4714 verbatim from the Maryland General Assembly's Statutes Text pages (read 2026-10-08), which carry no copyright notice.

Statute text enacted by a state legislature is outside copyright under the government edicts doctrine. In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., 590 U.S. 255 (2020) (slip opinion, read 2026-10-01), the Supreme Court held: "Under what has been dubbed the government edicts doctrine, officials empowered to speak with the force of law cannot be the authors of—and therefore cannot copyright—the works they create in the course of their official duties."

Conditions: none attach to the statute text. The corpus still names the official source in its Sources section and in the fact document's {.meta} provenance lines. Its Meta section says what it changed: anchors added, whitespace collapsed, nothing reworded.

Sources